Sam Raimi Interview, SpiderMan 3Posted by: Sheila Roberts
We caught up with Legendary Directory Sam Raimi to talk to him about his new film SpiderMan 3. Raimi returns to helm a third adventure with one of the worldâ€™s most popular comic book superheroes in Spider-Manâ„¢ 3 after directing the first two blockbuster adventures, Spider-Manâ„¢ and Spider-Manâ„¢ 2.
Raimi previously directed the supernatural thriller The Gift starring Cate Blanchett, Hilary Swank, Keanu Reeves, Greg Kinnear, and Giovanni Ribisi. Raimi also directed the acclaimed suspense thriller A Simple Plan, which starred Bill Paxton, Billy Bob Thornton, and Bridget Fonda, and earned Thornton an Academy AwardÂ® nomination for Best Supporting Actor. Additional directorial credits include the baseball homage For Love of the Game starring Kevin Costner and Kelly Preston.
With his longtime producing partner Rob Tapert, Raimi returned to his horror roots in 2002, forming Ghost House Pictures. Ghost House is dedicated to the financing, development, and distribution of high concept genre films. Their next release is David Sladeâ€™s 30 Days of Night, based on the comic book by Steve Niles.
Known for his imaginative filmmaking style, richly drawn characters and offbeat humor, Raimi wrote and directed the cult classic The Evil Dead, which became an immediate favorite when it debuted at the Cannes Film Festival and spawned the equally impressive Evil Dead II.
Raimi then proved his mastery of the fantasy thriller genre, writing and directing Darkman starring Liam Neeson and Frances McDormand, which he followed up with Army of Darkness, a comic sword-and-sorcery fantasy starring Bruce Campbell. Raimi also served as executive producer for John Wooâ€™s Hard Target, and co-wrote (with Joel and Ethan Coen) The Hudsucker Proxy starring Tim Robbins, Paul Newman, and Jennifer Jason Leigh. Raimi also directed the western The Quick and the Dead starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Sharon Stone, Russell Crowe, and Gene Hackman.
Raimiâ€™s extensive television work includes the hit syndicated series "Xena: Warrior Princess,â€ which he executive produced with Tapert. The highly successful series starring Lucy Lawless ran for six seasons. Raimi and Tapert also executive produced the enormously popular "Hercules: Legendary Journeysâ€ and served as executive producers for the CBS series "American Gothic.â€
Raimiâ€™s interest in filmmaking began as a youngster in Michigan, where he directed his own Super 8 films. Later, he left Michigan State University to form Renaissance Pictures with Tapert and longtime friend and actor Bruce Campbell. Here is what he had to tell us:
Q: What was it like coming back to direct Spider-Man the third time around?
Sam Raimi: It was great working on the third one in many ways and it was very difficult in many ways. The easiest thing was that the team was the same. Not just the producers who I became very familiar with and we have a shorthand way of working now, but I had the same production designer, the editor was the same, the animators were the same. They had learned how to move Spider-Man with greater grace and they had learned from a lot of their mistakes. So it was definitely easier because of the shorthand of communication. But also we had all learned a lot of lessons, so we could make new mistakes and we didnâ€™t have to repeat the same ones. But also working with the actors, that was the biggest advantage of the third picture, because what weâ€™re always after in scenes is to try and find a moment that will reverberate with the audience.
Like if someone is heartbroken, we want the audience to have felt that themselves and to get there we have to make it a real moment of truth. Something about it has to be real. However melodramatic the drama may be, there has to be truth in the actorâ€™s performance. I met Tobey and Kirsten seven years ago and we worked on the first picture as professional people, but then our friendship deepened on the second picture and I had a much greater degree of trust in them. I think they trusted me perhaps more and we werenâ€™t afraid of hurting each otherâ€™s feelings, werenâ€™t afraid of saying, â€˜I donâ€™t know what youâ€™re talking about.â€™ Sometimes when you talk about emotions, words sometimes come up short when youâ€™re trying to describe a feeling you have or a feeling that youâ€™re lacking from an actor.
The depth of our friendship and just the closeness of our working relationship really enabled us to attempt to get at the truthful moments to a greater degree. Iâ€™m not saying that we were always successful because we werenâ€™t. We often missed them, but at least we were very close in our relationship so that we could really speak honestly with each other about what we felt was lacking and what we felt we needed.
Q: Can you address the anti-organic web shooter contingent? Have they finally let that slide and cut you some slack?
Raimi: I donâ€™t know. Maybe not because I think what youâ€™re referring to is in the Spider-Man comic book written by Stan Lee. He had a mechanical web shooter and there was a great objection against the fans online that I was destroying their character. But, I love Spider-Man also. What I was trying to do was take James Cameronâ€™s idea which was actually in a story that he had written and I thought thatâ€™s a great idea of his because it makes the great spirit of what Stan Lee did so unique, that Peter Parker is a regular guy. Heâ€™s one of us and hereâ€™s a hero that we can identify with who has all the common thoughts and mishaps of any of us.
So the fact that he was a mechanical engineer and could create this special substance and this special gadget, I felt it was better to ignore in an attempt to be truer to the spirit of the character that
Q: You came up with the story for this as well as the screenplay. Did you work with your brother on this?
Raimi: Yes, I worked with my brother and Alvin Sargent, the great screenwriter, contributed quite a bit.
Q: So what was the challenge in coming up with this story for the third time?
Raimi: Well this time the story was pretty much set up by the first two pictures. What wasnâ€™t set up by the first two pictures was really influenced greatly from all the great writers and artists of the Marvel comic books of the first 45 years. It was more about sorting through the material and trying to figure out how best to conclude these story lines and where next our character, Peter Parker, had to grow to as a human being.
Q: Can you talk about bringing in the new villains?
Raimi: They came about in different ways. Hereâ€™s what we did. We first decided to approach the problem like this. Where is Peter Parker at the end of the second picture as a human being? Heâ€™s a kid in all these stories. Theyâ€™re kind of coming of age stories and he learns different aspects of growing up, different life lessons in each of these films and often times in the comic books. So my brother and I spoke for quite some time and we felt that the most important thing Peter right now has to learn is that this whole concept of him as the avenger or him as the hero, he wears this red and blue outfit, with each criminal he brings to justice, heâ€™s trying to pay down this debt of guilt he feels about the death of Uncle Ben.
He considers himself a hero and a sinless person versus these villains that he nabs. We felt it would be a great thing for him to learn a little less black and white view of life and thatâ€™s he not above these people. Heâ€™s not just the hero and theyâ€™re not just the villains. They were all human beings and that he himself might have some sin within him and that other human beings, the ones he calls the criminals, have some humanity within them and that the best we can do in this world is to not strive for vengeance, but for forgiveness. So that was what we felt would be the next broadening of his awareness as a human being
Q: Yes, but the theme of redemption applies to more than one character. Were you conscious that this could be the thread from the beginning?
Raimi: No, I wasnâ€™t conscious of that at the beginning. We wanted Harry Osborne, his good friend, that relationship with Peter Parker and him to be resolved by this third picture. We had obviously set up the scenes to have some dramatic confrontation and resolution in this third one and we knew in our hearts that Harry was a good boy and good person and was just acting under the mistaken belief that Peter had killed his father in cold blood and perhaps wanting to hang on to the notion that his father was an honorable man and perhaps that he could still be the son that his father wanted him to be if he just acted a little more strongly and avenged his death. But it wasnâ€™t as simple as that for him. Eventually the truth comes out and he finds his true self.
Q: It also applies to
Raimi: Yes, it does.
Q: So how did you get to the two villains?
Raimi: So we decided thatâ€™s the journey Peter Parker has to go on. Then we said, what villain will best represent the conflict that can dramatize his journey? If the hero runs into this conflict, how can he learn forgiveness? Weâ€™ll make the villain piece someone who is absolutely unforgivable in Peterâ€™s eyes to really take him to a place where the audience understands his desire for vengeance and they feel it so that the kids will think â€˜Yes, bring the Sandman down, Spider-Man.â€™ And then by the end of the piece, you want the kids to go on this journey with Spider-Man so that theyâ€™d say, â€˜No, actually as my hero, the best thing that you could do right now, the thing Iâ€™d rather have you do is forgive this man.â€™ We thought that would be a worthwhile summer picture and a good story for the kids if we could incorporate that.
We said okay, weâ€™re going to make it a villain that we can make Peter Parker really feel his desire for vengeance against him in a real heavy way so the audience has a sense of relief when he forgives Sandman so it means something to them dramatically. We chose a villain that did not have such a detailed back story that I would be in defiance of those comic book fans. What I didnâ€™t tell you is when I changed those web shooters, they sent a petition with 2,000 signatures to the Chairman of Sony to have me removed from the picture. So Iâ€™m trying to steer clear of that this time. But really we wanted someone we werenâ€™t in defiance of because the fans do love the characters and so do I and we wanted to add to the history of one that was slightly less detailed. The Sandman Iâ€™ve always thought was a great visual character and could be a formidable foe against Spider-Man from all the great Marvel comic books and yet his background wasnâ€™t so detailed or defined that this would be in conflict. We added to the story that he in fact was the murderer of Uncle Ben. We also liked the idea that by adding thisâ€¦
Itâ€™s all about the awareness of things. Peter Parker sees things as a proud person in this picture in a very narrow way that heâ€™s right and theyâ€™re wrong. Itâ€™s all about taking on other points of view. There are so many more truths than the simple truths of good or bad or the name as perceived. For instance, that man didnâ€™t kill his uncle as he had thought. It was another man. This is just an example of why we felt it was right. But we also wanted something you could look back at the first picture and turn the whole thing on its head, so that by the time you got to the end, it was more than the sum of the parts. We thought that would be an interesting experience for the audience and that what they had seen in the first part was true, but there was so much more to the story. Like Peter Parker, they didnâ€™t have the whole truth and they thought they did.
Q: Thereâ€™s talk of you being interested in The Hobbit. If you end up directing the film, would it be part of the world that Peter Jackson created?
Raimi: I havenâ€™t even thought about that because I donâ€™t really know what Iâ€™m doing next. Itâ€™s so soon, my ears are still ringing from the mix on this picture.
Q: You mention a lot of spiritual concepts in terms of forgiveness and redemption and sin, but thereâ€™s also a lot of spiritual imagery especially on these last two films such as Peter on the front of the runaway train in a crucifix form in Spider-Man 2 and then here where he takes his suit off in the church. Is that intentional and what does it all mean?
Raimi: Well that imagery from the church is really far from the story. We wanted to be true to the comic books. Itâ€™s very similar in how it was depicted in those classic Marvel comic books of the 80â€™s which Iâ€™ve more recently become familiar with of how Spider-Man shed his suit and how it came upon Eddie Brock.
We were trying to pay tribute to those books. But there are a lot of literary concepts and spiritual concepts within the comic books. They reverberate and they work for me. The ones that worked for the writers, we incorporated into the story.
Q: You seemed to have a lot of fun with Peter Parker embracing his darker side. Can you talk about creating that aspect of the movie?
Raimi: Well, in this story, Peter Parker falls victim to his own pride. He starts to believe all the press clippings about himself, that heâ€™s really this hero and somebody great. He starts to be afraid that he isnâ€™t that person and doesnâ€™t want to act any other way than the person thatâ€™s right. That pride manifests itself in a much darker way. Working on those sequences with Tobey Maguire and the dark Spider-Man, that was a difficult thing for me actually. It wasnâ€™t fun for me because I didnâ€™t like those sequences.
I donâ€™t like watching Spider-Man go bad. It was unpleasant and I kept worrying, â€˜Gee, do I really have to do this to show how rageful and vengeful he is? Do we really have to show how pride can destroy you?â€™ But, my brother kept telling me, â€˜Yes, because heâ€™s going to find himself again after he loses himself.â€™
Q: What about the sexy, choreographed sequences? Those looked like they were a lot of fun to shoot?
Raimi: That was fun. I agree. I was referring more to the sequence of Mary Jane and the Jazz club or his treatment of Harry Osborne in that sequence.
Q: Was that John Travolta and Saturday Night Fever in that sequence?
Raimi: Actually it was not an attempt to imitate that great dance sequence, but I know people have said that to me, that itâ€™s very similar to that.
Q: Your childhood friend Josh Becker talked about growing up with you and he said the irony was you were a smart ass and tagged along with your older brother and that you had a huge obsession with comic books. Can you talk about how accurate that is and the impact of your early filmmaking days in
Raimi: Well thatâ€™s where I started, in
Then we started making original films only because we ran out of cassettes. We didnâ€™t have a soundtrack and everyone contributed. There was really no director. There was, â€˜You run the camera. Weâ€™ll do this guy. Can you get some pies from the store so we can have a pie fight?â€™ They were all comedies. Then we started showing them to the kids and they would laugh. When they were good, they would laugh. So we really started to focus our desires on, â€˜Oh letâ€™s make it with better pace. This one was too slow. Letâ€™s have a really big stunt. A big fall here.â€™ The audiences started to determine what we would make for the pictures, and because we wanted to make people laugh, they were all comedies. Then we started to show our films at school on the lunch hour and the kids would see them. Weâ€™d charge them a dollar, or .50 cents probably back then, and weâ€™d show our films at lunch hour and the kids would laugh and weâ€™d love it. Every weekend weâ€™d get together and make our movies. Then we went off to college and I just kept making films from there. But, yes, I was a tag along kid, yeah, with my brother. Thatâ€™s true.
Q: The Venom character was not one from your comic book experience, but you found a way to integrate him into your vision. How long did it take you to get a handle on the character and figure out what to do with him?
Raimi: To finish that question and lead into yours, thatâ€™s how the Sandman came about. We were trying to develop a character who represented that conflict for our hero. Once we finished the story, Avi, my producer and partner and the former head of Marvel comic books, said, â€˜Sam listen, you are so aware of all of these 70â€™s villains, but you really need to incorporate Venom into this story because the fans really love Venom, and donâ€™t be so selfish with just villains that you know and love.â€™ So I said, â€˜Okay.â€™ I didnâ€™t understand that much about Venom because I hadnâ€™t really read him as a kid.
So I went to school on Venom, and Avi taught me a lot about Venom, and then Alvin Sargent, our screenwriter, he really was the voice of Venom in the writing of the screenplay and he showed me who he was. Then Topher Grace brought another life to the character until finally I had to go to school on all of these people being my teachers as to who he was. I learned who he was in trying to satisfy the comic book fans and incorporate Venom into the story.
Q: Sony has announced there is going to be Spider-Man, the Broadway musical with Julie Taymor, and that they are also planning to do Spider-Man 4, 5 and 6. Are you going to have anything to do with either of those?
Raimi: Iâ€™m not involved in the musical. That sounds very exciting and Iâ€™d love to go see it though. I love U2 so thatâ€™s going to be great and Julie Taymorâ€™s picture was great. "Fridaâ€ is the only one I saw, but I loved that picture. I saw the LA production of Lion King.
That was staged beautifully. I donâ€™t know if that was her staging, but that was fantastic. But no, Iâ€™m not involved in that. And yes, Sony is making 4, 5 and 6, but I havenâ€™t had time to even think about involvement and I donâ€™t want to assume that they are definitely going to ask me to do it. I donâ€™t want to be presumptuous about that. Not yet I havenâ€™t.
Q: Would you like to?
Raimi: If there was a great story to tell and I had a really good take on where the character could grow to now, then I think it would be great. But Iâ€™d have to have a tremendous passion to do it because so many people love Stan Leeâ€™s character. If I didnâ€™t think I could do it fantastically, than I should step aside and let a younger director come in who loves the character and said he could do it with the greatest passion on the earth.
Q: If you do it, do you think youâ€™ll take a break in between and perhaps direct another movie like "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea?â€
Raimi: I wasnâ€™t going to be directing that picture actually. I would definitely need a break. Right now I couldnâ€™t. I just donâ€™t know.
Q: With so many years of Spider-Man in your life, you donâ€™t have the feeling like you want to say goodbye to Spider-Man?
Raimi: It would be very hard to say goodbye to Spidey.
Q: Whatâ€™s going on with Ghost House, your production company?
Raimi: Ghost House Pictures is a company that I have with my partners, Rob Tapert and Mandate Pictures. We make supernatural, spooky horror fare.
Q: What projects do you have coming up?
Raimi: Right now weâ€™re finishing up the post production on "30 Days of Nightâ€ based on the graphic novel with Steve Niles. Jeff Lynch, a second unit director that I worked with on this film, somebody I really respect and a friend of mine, heâ€™s going to be directing a film called "Drag Me to Hellâ€ and thatâ€™s a nonstop low budget horror picture. Thatâ€™s in preproduction.
Q: How about "The Evil Deadâ€ franchise? Whatâ€™s the status on that?
Raimi: I would definitely like to make another "Evil Deadâ€ film with Bruce [
Q: For the action sequences in this movie, when everybody is in costume, are those all stunt men or was that digital?
Raimi: Usually when heâ€™s got the full costume on, itâ€™s either a stunt man or itâ€™s digital. However, if itâ€™s ever a performance issue like if Spider-Man ever stops and stands or if he ever lands in frame and has to be in some place emotionally, itâ€™s Tobey. Even though you canâ€™t tell, I can tell. Itâ€™s such a big difference when you put Tobey in the outfit. Heâ€™s performing the character and it comes through the outfit. But anything thatâ€™s dangerous or that wouldnâ€™t look physically sound, we go with the CG character.
Q: If there is a new series of Spider-Man trilogy, do you think it should be a new Spider-Man?
Raimi: I donâ€™t know. I would have to make that choice probably based on what the story is and what the characters are, but I couldnâ€™t say. It would be very hard to be involved without Tobey and Kirsten, for me at least.
Q: Since weâ€™re talking about all these big franchises that you may be attached to, is that something youâ€™re comfortable with, being a franchise guy now?
Raimi: Well I know that that will pass. Mostly I see myself as who I was for the 20 years of making films professionally before my Super- 8 days and that was Mr. low budget slockmeister horror film guy. You know low budget crime thriller or low budget supernatural thriller. Although I have the occasional different picture, I always thought that it was strange that Amy Pascal hired me to do this film. I really loved the film and I wanted it, but I thought it was a bold and unusual choice. When it had that tremendous success, this big franchise, I realized this too will pass. This is a very strange experience and I realized how unusual it is and I know that it wonâ€™t be here long.