Insidious? Really? That was laughable at best. Not something I would put on the genre of horror. 

It started out good but the ending sucked!!

 despite being badly acted it was decent because it was original.  finally a writer decided to break away from the traditional and silly christian views of heaven and hell and instead worked in the more abstract (yet oddly somewhat more believable) idea of astral projection and the astral planes.  but when Tiptoe Through the Tulips started playing, i busted up laughing and that did kind of kill the horror part of it for me.

Silly Christian views? Don’t say shit about people’s religion thank you very much!

 Christians don’t say shit

Silly Christian, Do you REALLY think two of every animal was on a boat for forty years and not one of them killed another?  Despite the fact that most of them eat each other?  I love Christians, they give me something to laugh about

Shane i will do you JUSTICE by letting you know that all religions have tales and stories that give us information on how to live our lives as good people, things we should not do, etc. Most of these stories are usually very fictionalized for many different purposes, mainly to make the lessons epic so we dont forget them. YOU are the one that takes them literally, which makes YOU ignorant. I am speaking on behalf of no religion, i am stating the facts. Though i respect many opinions, i do not respect yours because it is completely illogical, but good try.

 oh a debate on religion,.. Hello internet… Who cares? Live your lives, respect one another and believe in yourselves and the others around you. God can’t tell you that, oh wait “god” hasn’t actually made an appearance yet so put down your silly little brainwashing bibles/books/stories and how about you write a book on your experiences not worshipping someone elses. Do you think in 2000 years Harry Potter will be the new jesus? Place your bets now..

If they forgot morality and only reason they are moral is from a fairy tale, then that makes them idiots. No, Shane probably doesn’t take them literally and you are not stating facts, nor was Shane illogical in any form.

Your response is idiotic. I’m well aware that all religions have tales and stories, which is why they’re all bullshit. I don’t have a desire to enter a religious debate, just the desire to let you know that what you wrote was idiotic, but good try

Before you judge another religion, please do your history. The Bible says in Genesis 7:24; That they were in the ark for 150 days while it rained. Then in chapter 8 it says they were in the ark for another 150 days while the water receded. And then Noah waited for the ark to rest on land, after that he even waited longer before he left the ark. But if you add all the days he spent in the ark up (aka doing your research) you would see that Noah was in the ark for one year and ten days. So about 375 days, that is much less than 40 years. I mean no offence by correcting you, I just don’t want you believing a lie that you have been told.

That was a typo.

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

How did you come up with 375 days? I mean you gave no specific time for how much longer Noah spent in the Ark. You gave specifics of how long they (meaning animals and Noah’s family) were initially on the Ark, which totaled 300 days. Since you did not mention that the animals stayed on the Ark longer I can only presume that they were freed after 300 days. So how did you come to the conclusion that Noah stayed on the Ark for an additional 75 days? That’s an additional 3 and a half months. That’s a long time to stay cooped up in a likely stinky, probably very worn boat, when you have the ability to get out and be on land after being on water for such an extended period of time. Where is the logic in that?

shhh

garbage.  Way to go over budget and then just make up some bullshit for the third act.

i completely agree with you, it had some creepy moments(family woth doll faces) and some cheap scares, but i loved it! the only thing i didnt like was the design of the demon or whatever it was, it could have been a lot better…

paranormal 1,2,3 are so lame not scary in the slightest in less your a teenage girl perhaps. I have given up on horror films they are just pathetic now days. please recommend one that makes u jump and actually makes u nervous. the last film i saw that i could recomend was law abiding citizen.

oh and no vamps, monsters, zombies ect its just stupid lol

this is so true, i feel the exact same. Whilst searching for horrors all i see are zombie films. And paranormal activity is so bloody lame

zombiesare one of the most amazing intense and thought provoking monsters in filography everyone has thougt about what they would do in a zombie apocolypse evryone loveszombie films get your shit together

That was a good movie (Law Abiding Citizen) But far from scary!

Law abiding citizen is one of the absolute worst films of all time. Gerard Butler? Seriously? If you want scary watch The Descent and The Descent II.

 Descent 1 nd 2 are gay…kinda tells ur story there buddy..lol

 I agree, it is cheap horror, the shaky camera and the “who’s round the corner” crap. I’ve seen all 3, and on the third I knew it would be a long wait til something substantial happens. The only horror that took place was right at the end.

umm try sixth sense, when i first watched it it creeped me out its real good try it and tell me what you think 😀

Every person has a unique view and opinion on what is “scary”   – for some it is the unknown and unknowable ghostly spirit, and for others it is the masked man with the blades. 

I have to agree! Paranormal activity was THE SHIT!!!

I’m a teenage girl and none of the paranormals scared me in the slightest

I call shenanigans on that one

 It’s not about success, paranormal activity just isn’t scary in the slightest…and while we’re on the subject why is every one on about the decent? It also is mediocre

Paranormal Activity I’ll admit has a good story but is not that scary really although this is coming from someone who has never been scared in there life by a horror film

 Only thing scary about Paranaormal Activity is that it’s based on true events…so that’s just freaky..

Hahahaha.   “True events” is a loose term. Every religion has a holy book claiming “true events.”  

lol sorry thats kinda funny – just the “true events” part – hey Im Christian love horror movies (strange mix i know) but saying paranormal activity is based on true events? Just kind on funny. Yeah I beleive spirits evil and good are out their and that sort of stuff does happen but saying that movie(s) are based on true events is like saying your typical kidnap torture rape movie is based on true events. Besides that Paranormal Activity was sooooo boring I almost fell asleep. hate it when people film like ‘oh! its happening right now!’ lol just to give their lame ass junk an extra edge.

Also, what’s scary about it is, no it’s not.  Not one scene in that movie even claimed to be based on true events.  Blair Witch claimed to be based on true events but wasn’t either.  If you’re gullible enough to believe that, I bet you’re also a Christian

Your a retard. Nothing about any paranormal shit is real, but there are killers and crazy people in the world. That’s freaky

You can keep your beliefs about paranormal stuff not being real to yourself.

Paranormal Activity is NOT scary, but I still loved it. What does that make me?

 a fucking idiot

fuck you, its a clever concept. Im not agreeing with the second and third though

my goodness, be nice. just because people don’t agree with u  doesnt give you right to name call.

 all three films are …. how to puts this with a touch of delicacy…bored me to shit….but then yet begin my favourite genera   i havent been afraid of any film since i was about 10….how ever if yall want freaky im surprised that none of you have spoken of  the cemetery 1 and 2,  the first 3 chucky’s and how can you guys forget hell all of the hell razor movies????

That’s absolutely ridiculous.  That was one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen.  The acting was so unbelievably awful I couldn’t convince myself of any realism if I tried.  That movie was a complete trainwreck.

Paranormal activity was not scary at all good movie but not ac scary and im 13 says something -.-

PA is only scarey to young people or those that have only recently even starting watching horror. Dating back there are much better and scarier Ghost movies. Tell me the scene you found so “disturbingly” scarey in PA? *crickets* Try The Entity for something really scarey of that genre.

You’re probably one of those people who likes films that are successful and popular.

 think it is a remake this will be the 3rd one to be done

you’re all strangely sure about it being a remake for people who have obviously never read anything about it. it’s not a remake. spend 30 seconds on the internet reading about it and find out for yourselves.

And look at that… now that it’s out, turns out… IT IS A REMAKE!!!  They may say it’s not and they end the movie trying to sync up with the John Carpenter version, but it’s the same exact damned story… Find Alien Space Craft. Check. Find Alien Body. Check.  Bring Alien Body to research station in giant melting ice cube. Check.  Have monster take the shape of dogs. Check.  Have the only way to find out who’s infected and who isn’t be to test their blood. Check… do I really need to go on?  They say it’s a prequel, but these schmo’s simply tried to wrote a check their asses couldn’t cash and when they got handed the movie by the studio, they did… gasp… get ready for it… a REMAKE! The only difference is… this time it sucked!

*…”Write a check…”

Do you feel bad to find out that it was indeed, NOT a remake but a prequel? It even ties into the original at the end when the dog runs away from the helicopter and they start shooting where, what do you know, THE FIRST ONE starts. Boom, pwnd with knowledge. Fuck tard.

 Teeth was funny. Sucks if you say its a horror mov… Oh wait. I guess you could say this is a horror movie when you think about you being the guy who’s dick just got bitten of by a vagina. Thinking about that, Teeth is fucking scary.

 I was 4 when I first saw it. Was terrified of bathrooms ’till I was like 10 and scared of the dark for a couple of years after that. 😛

fuck your own ass. why you r visiting the tpic???…mother fucker